My op-ed in the new Chronicle of Philanthropy
It's on the social enterprise bubble, and you can read it here.
Tags:
4 Comments
Leave a comment
About
Search
Archives
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Sign In
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from trexfiles23. Make your own badge here.




Bookmarked. Great food for thought.
"Rather, what made social enterprise compelling was its promise of creating higher meaning out of the mundane. In this respect, social enterprise is much more than a fad. It is profoundly human."
Yes. I do a lot of work with rebuilding local networks for food, business, and culture. This has been on my mind. For instance, last weekend some other volunteers and I assisted at a winter farmers' market, a new, grassroots production that is the fruit of a couple years' cultivation of consumer and producer. There are numbers of people now rushing to embrace local food sourcing; but I can't get over the thought that, if we are just asking them to shift consumption from one source to another, the gains from this effort will be narrow and limited - we have simply replaced one producer of goods with another. There are some important things that can result from that - environmental and security benefits - but we are still essentially just shifting market pressure and benefit from one production location to another.
If, instead, we are asking ourselves to build new and richer identities and communities, aiming to be more human while we do business that is very tightly integrated with values and relationships, *then* we're on to something.
Bookmarked. Great food for thought.
"Rather, what made social enterprise compelling was its promise of creating higher meaning out of the mundane. In this respect, social enterprise is much more than a fad. It is profoundly human."
Yes. I do a lot of work with rebuilding local networks for food, business, and culture. This has been on my mind. For instance, last weekend some other volunteers and I assisted at a winter farmers' market, a new, grassroots production that is the fruit of a couple years' cultivation of consumer and producer. There are numbers of people now rushing to embrace local food sourcing; but I can't get over the thought that, if we are just asking them to shift consumption from one source to another, the gains from this effort will be narrow and limited - we have simply replaced one producer of goods with another. There are some important things that can result from that - environmental and security benefits - but we are still essentially just shifting market pressure and benefit from one production location to another.
If, instead, we are asking ourselves to build new and richer identities and communities, aiming to be more human while we do business that is very tightly integrated with values and relationships, *then* we're on to something.
Bookmarked. Great food for thought.
"Rather, what made social enterprise compelling was its promise of creating higher meaning out of the mundane. In this respect, social enterprise is much more than a fad. It is profoundly human."
Yes. I do a lot of work with rebuilding local networks for food, business, and culture. This has been on my mind. For instance, last weekend some other volunteers and I assisted at a winter farmers' market, a new, grassroots production that is the fruit of a couple years' cultivation of consumer and producer. There are numbers of people now rushing to embrace local food sourcing; but I can't get over the thought that, if we are just asking them to shift consumption from one source to another, the gains from this effort will be narrow and limited - we have simply replaced one producer of goods with another. There are some important things that can result from that - environmental and security benefits - but we are still essentially just shifting market pressure and benefit from one production location to another.
If, instead, we are asking ourselves to build new and richer identities and communities, aiming to be more human while we do business that is very tightly integrated with values and relationships, *then* we're on to something.
egad. Sorry about my internet connection...